CYP4F22

Overview

Due to minimal support in the original primary data, low expression in BL and no mutations reported in subsequent studies, this gene is very unlikely to be relevant in BL.

History

%%{init: { 'logLevel': 'debug', 'theme': 'dark' } }%% timeline title Publication timing 2012-12-01 : Love : BL

Relevance tier by entity

Entity Tier Description
BL 2 relevance in BL not firmly established

Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis)

Entity source frequency (%)
BL GAMBL genomes+capture 1.39
BL Thomas cohort NA
BL Panea cohort NA

Mutation pattern and selective pressure estimates

Entity aSHM Significant selection dN/dS (missense) dN/dS (nonsense)
BL No No 1.467 9.614
DLBCL No No 1.320 0.000
FL No No 0.000 0.000

View coding variants in ProteinPaint hg19 or hg38

View all variants in GenomePaint hg19 or hg38

CYP4F22 Expression

Representative mutation

References

  1. Love C, Sun Z, Jima D, Li G, Zhang J, Miles R, Richards KL, Dunphy CH, Choi WWL, Srivastava G, Lugar PL, Rizzieri DA, Lagoo AS, Bernal-Mizrachi L, Mann KP, Flowers CR, Naresh KN, Evens AM, Chadburn A, Gordon LI, Czader MB, Gill JI, Hsi ED, Greenough A, Moffitt AB, McKinney M, Banerjee A, Grubor V, Levy S, Dunson DB, Dave SS. The genetic landscape of mutations in Burkitt lymphoma. Nat Genet. 2012 Dec;44(12):1321–1325. PMCID: PMC3674561