4f33a1821c8ddddb28aada01fd4257579f9ff4d2
BRAF.md
| ... | ... | @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ link-citations: true |
| 9 | 9 | BRAF mutations, particularly the BRAF V600E hot spot mutation, are primarily associated with hairy cell leukemia and are rare in other B-cell lymphomas. These mutations play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of HCL and have important diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Although they are rare, mutations in BRAF are reproducibly observed in some DLBCLs. Another hot spot, D594A, occurs in DLBCL. The role of these in lymphomagenesis remains poorly understood but functional evidence suggests they may contribute to aneuploidy.[@tiacciBRAFMutationsHairycell2011a] |
| 10 | 10 | Although mutations have also been reported in BL, due to [minimal support](BRAF#representative-mutation) in the original primary data and very few mutations reported in subsequent studies, this gene is very unlikely to be relevant in BL. |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene in BL failed QC")>> |
|
| 13 | + |
|
| 12 | 14 | ## History |
| 13 | 15 | ```mermaid |
| 14 | 16 | %%{init: { 'logLevel': 'debug', 'theme': 'dark' } }%% |
| ... | ... | @@ -24,7 +26,7 @@ timeline |
| 24 | 26 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 25 | 27 | ||1|high-confidence MZL gene| |
| 26 | 28 | | |1 |high-confidence DLBCL gene [@tiacciBRAFMutationsHairycell2011a]| |
| 27 | -| |2 |relevance in BL is unlikely[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 29 | +| |2 |Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 28 | 30 | |
| 29 | 31 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 30 | 32 |
C6orf27.md
| ... | ... | @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ link-citations: true |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 10 | Due to [minimal support](C6orf27#representative-mutation) in the original primary data and very few mutations reported in subsequent studies, this gene is very unlikely to be relevant in BL. |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 14 | ## History |
| 14 | 15 | ```mermaid |
| ... | ... | @@ -22,7 +23,7 @@ timeline |
| 22 | 23 | |
| 23 | 24 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 24 | 25 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 25 | -| |2 |relevance in BL not firmly established[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 26 | +| |2-F |Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 26 | 27 | |
| 27 | 28 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 28 | 29 |
CAD.md
| ... | ... | @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ link-citations: true |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 10 | Due to [minimal support](CAD#representative-mutation) in the original primary data and very few mutations reported in subsequent studies, this gene is very unlikely to be relevant in BL. |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 14 | ## History |
| 14 | 15 | ```mermaid |
| ... | ... | @@ -22,7 +23,7 @@ timeline |
| 22 | 23 | |
| 23 | 24 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 24 | 25 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 25 | -| |2 |relevance in BL not firmly established[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 26 | +| |2-F |Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 26 | 27 | |
| 27 | 28 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 28 | 29 |
CCT6B.md
| ... | ... | @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ link-citations: true |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 10 | Due to [minimal support](CCT6B#representative-mutations) in the original primary data and very few mutations reported in subsequent studies, this gene is very unlikely to be relevant in BL. |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 14 | ## History |
| 14 | 15 | |
| ... | ... | @@ -23,7 +24,7 @@ timeline |
| 23 | 24 | |
| 24 | 25 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 25 | 26 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 26 | -| |2 |relevance in BL not firmly established[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 27 | +| |2-F |Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 27 | 28 | |
| 28 | 29 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 29 | 30 |
CDH17.md
| ... | ... | @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ link-citations: true |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 10 | Due to [minimal support](CDH17#representative-mutations) in the original primary data and very few mutations reported in subsequent studies, this gene is very unlikely to be relevant in BL. |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 14 | ## History |
| 14 | 15 | ```mermaid |
| ... | ... | @@ -22,7 +23,7 @@ timeline |
| 22 | 23 | |
| 23 | 24 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 24 | 25 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 25 | -| |2 |relevance in BL not firmly established[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 26 | +| |2-F |Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 26 | 27 | |
| 27 | 28 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 28 | 29 |
COL4A2.md
| ... | ... | @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ link-citations: true |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 10 | Due to [minimal support](COL4A2#representative-mutations) in the original primary data and very few mutations reported in subsequent studies, this gene is very unlikely to be relevant in BL. |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 14 | ## History |
| 14 | 15 | |
| ... | ... | @@ -23,7 +24,7 @@ timeline |
| 23 | 24 | |
| 24 | 25 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 25 | 26 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 26 | -| |2 |relevance in BL not firmly established[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 27 | +| |2-F |Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 27 | 28 | |
| 28 | 29 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 29 | 30 | |
| ... | ... | @@ -69,4 +70,4 @@ View all variants in GenomePaint [hg19](https://morinlab.github.io/LLMPP/GAMBL/C |
| 69 | 70 | [747](https://www.bcgsc.ca/downloads/morinlab/GAMBL/Love/747_reports.html) |
| 70 | 71 | |
| 71 | 72 | |
| 72 | -## References |
|
| ... | ... | \ No newline at end of file |
| 0 | +## References |
CYB5D1.md
| ... | ... | @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ link-citations: true |
| 5 | 5 | --- |
| 6 | 6 | # CYB5D1 |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 9 | + |
|
| 8 | 10 | ## History |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 12 | ```mermaid |
| ... | ... | @@ -18,7 +20,7 @@ timeline |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 21 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 20 | 22 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 21 | -| |2 |relevance in BL not firmly established[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 23 | +| |2-F |Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 22 | 24 | |
| 23 | 25 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 24 | 26 |
CYP4F22.md
| ... | ... | @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ link-citations: true |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 10 | Due to [minimal support](CYP4F22#representative-mutation) in the original primary data, [low expression in BL](CYP4F22#cyp4f22-expression) and no mutations reported in subsequent studies, this gene is very unlikely to be relevant in BL. |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 13 | + |
|
| 12 | 14 | ## History |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 16 | ```mermaid |
| ... | ... | @@ -22,7 +24,7 @@ timeline |
| 22 | 24 | |
| 23 | 25 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 24 | 26 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 25 | -| |2 |relevance in BL not firmly established[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 27 | +| |2-F |Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 26 | 28 | |
| 27 | 29 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 28 | 30 |
EML2.md
| ... | ... | @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ link-citations: true |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 8 | Due to [minimal support](EML2#representative-mutation) in the original primary data and very few mutations reported in subsequent studies, this gene is very unlikely to be relevant in BL. |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene in BL failed QC")>> |
|
| 11 | + |
|
| 10 | 12 | ## History |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 14 | ```mermaid |
| ... | ... | @@ -20,7 +22,7 @@ timeline |
| 20 | 22 | |
| 21 | 23 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 22 | 24 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 23 | -| |2 |relevance in BL not firmly established[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 25 | +| |2-F |Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 24 | 26 | |
| 25 | 27 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 26 | 28 |
ENTPD3.md
| ... | ... | @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ link-citations: true |
| 5 | 5 | --- |
| 6 | 6 | # ENTPD3 |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 9 | + |
|
| 8 | 10 | ## History |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 12 | ```mermaid |
| ... | ... | @@ -18,7 +20,7 @@ timeline |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 21 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 20 | 22 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 21 | -| |2-F |Failed QC| |
|
| 23 | +| |2-F |Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 22 | 24 | |
| 23 | 25 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 24 | 26 |
EPHB2.md
| ... | ... | @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ link-citations: true |
| 5 | 5 | --- |
| 6 | 6 | # EPHB2 |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 9 | + |
|
| 8 | 10 | ## History |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| ... | ... | @@ -19,7 +21,7 @@ timeline |
| 19 | 21 | |
| 20 | 22 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 21 | 23 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 22 | -| |2-F |Failed QC| |
|
| 24 | +| |2-F |Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 23 | 25 | |
| 24 | 26 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 25 | 27 |
FAM129B.md
| ... | ... | @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ link-citations: true |
| 5 | 5 | --- |
| 6 | 6 | # FAM129B |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 9 | + |
|
| 8 | 10 | ## History |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 12 | ```mermaid |
| ... | ... | @@ -18,7 +20,7 @@ timeline |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 21 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 20 | 22 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 21 | -| |2-F |Failed QC| |
|
| 23 | +| |2-F |Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 22 | 24 | |
| 23 | 25 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 24 | 26 |
FGFR3.md
| ... | ... | @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ link-citations: true |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 10 | Due to [minimal support](FGFR3#representative-mutation) in the original primary data and very few mutations reported in subsequent studies, this gene is very unlikely to be relevant in BL. |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene in BL failed QC")>> |
|
| 13 | + |
|
| 12 | 14 | ## History |
| 13 | 15 | ```mermaid |
| 14 | 16 | %%{init: { 'logLevel': 'debug', 'theme': 'dark' } }%% |
| ... | ... | @@ -21,7 +23,7 @@ timeline |
| 21 | 23 | |
| 22 | 24 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 23 | 25 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 24 | -| |2-F |Failed QC| |
|
| 26 | +| |2-F |Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 25 | 27 | |
| 26 | 28 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 27 | 29 |
FTCD.md
| ... | ... | @@ -5,6 +5,9 @@ link-citations: true |
| 5 | 5 | --- |
| 6 | 6 | # FTCD |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene in BL failed QC")>> |
|
| 9 | + |
|
| 10 | + |
|
| 8 | 11 | ## Overview |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 13 | Due to [minimal support](FTCD#representative-mutation) in the original primary data and very few mutations reported in subsequent studies, this gene is very unlikely to be relevant in BL. |
| ... | ... | @@ -23,7 +26,7 @@ timeline |
| 23 | 26 | |
| 24 | 27 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 25 | 28 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 26 | -| |2-F |Failed QC| |
|
| 29 | +| |2-F |Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 27 | 30 | |
| 28 | 31 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 29 | 32 |
GRIK5.md
| ... | ... | @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ link-citations: true |
| 5 | 5 | --- |
| 6 | 6 | # GRIK5 |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene in BL failed QC")>> |
|
| 9 | + |
|
| 8 | 10 | ## History |
| 9 | 11 | ```mermaid |
| 10 | 12 | %%{init: { 'logLevel': 'debug', 'theme': 'dark' } }%% |
| ... | ... | @@ -17,7 +19,7 @@ timeline |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 20 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 19 | 21 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 20 | -| |2-F |Failed QC| |
|
| 22 | +| |2-F |Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 21 | 23 | |
| 22 | 24 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 23 | 25 |
ICK.md
| ... | ... | @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ link-citations: true |
| 5 | 5 | --- |
| 6 | 6 | # ICK |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 9 | + |
|
| 8 | 10 | ## History |
| 9 | 11 | ```mermaid |
| 10 | 12 | %%{init: { 'logLevel': 'debug', 'theme': 'dark' } }%% |
| ... | ... | @@ -17,7 +19,7 @@ timeline |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 20 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 19 | 21 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 20 | -| |2-F |Failed QC| |
|
| 22 | +| |2-F |Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 21 | 23 | |
| 22 | 24 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 23 | 25 |
ITPR3.md
| ... | ... | @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ link-citations: true |
| 5 | 5 | --- |
| 6 | 6 | # ITPR3 |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 9 | + |
|
| 8 | 10 | ## History |
| 9 | 11 | ```mermaid |
| 10 | 12 | %%{init: { 'logLevel': 'debug', 'theme': 'dark' } }%% |
KIFC3.md
| ... | ... | @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ link-citations: true |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 8 | Due to [minimal support](KIFC3#representative-mutations) in the original primary data, [low expression in BL](KIFC3#kifc3-expression) and very few mutations reported in subsequent studies, this gene is very unlikely to be relevant in BL. |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 12 | ## History |
| 12 | 13 | ```mermaid |
MYH10.md
| ... | ... | @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ link-citations: true |
| 5 | 5 | --- |
| 6 | 6 | # MYH10 |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 9 | + |
|
| 8 | 10 | ## History |
| 9 | 11 | ```mermaid |
| 10 | 12 | %%{init: { 'logLevel': 'debug', 'theme': 'dark' } }%% |
| ... | ... | @@ -17,7 +19,7 @@ timeline |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 20 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 19 | 21 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 20 | -| |2-F |Failed QC| |
|
| 22 | +| |2-F |Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 21 | 23 | |
| 22 | 24 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 23 | 25 |
NRXN2.md
| ... | ... | @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ link-citations: true |
| 5 | 5 | --- |
| 6 | 6 | # NRXN2 |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 9 | + |
|
| 8 | 10 | ## History |
| 9 | 11 | ```mermaid |
| 10 | 12 | %%{init: { 'logLevel': 'debug', 'theme': 'dark' } }%% |
POLRMT.md
| ... | ... | @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ link-citations: true |
| 5 | 5 | --- |
| 6 | 6 | # POLRMT |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 9 | + |
|
| 8 | 10 | ## History |
| 9 | 11 | ```mermaid |
| 10 | 12 | %%{init: { 'logLevel': 'debug', 'theme': 'dark' } }%% |
POR.md
| ... | ... | @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ link-citations: true |
| 5 | 5 | --- |
| 6 | 6 | # POR |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 9 | + |
|
| 8 | 10 | ## History |
| 9 | 11 | ```mermaid |
| 10 | 12 | %%{init: { 'logLevel': 'debug', 'theme': 'dark' } }%% |
| ... | ... | @@ -17,7 +19,7 @@ timeline |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 20 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 19 | 21 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 20 | -| |2 |relevance in BL not firmly established[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 22 | +| |2-F | Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 21 | 23 | |
| 22 | 24 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 23 | 25 |
RBP3.md
| ... | ... | @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ link-citations: true |
| 5 | 5 | --- |
| 6 | 6 | # RBP3 |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 9 | + |
|
| 8 | 10 | ## History |
| 9 | 11 | ```mermaid |
| 10 | 12 | %%{init: { 'logLevel': 'debug', 'theme': 'dark' } }%% |
| ... | ... | @@ -17,7 +19,7 @@ timeline |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 20 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 19 | 21 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 20 | -| |2 |relevance in BL not firmly established[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 22 | +| |2-F |Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 21 | 23 | |
| 22 | 24 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 23 | 25 |
RET.md
| ... | ... | @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ link-citations: true |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 8 | Due to [minimal support](RET#representative-mutation) in the original primary data, [low expression in BL](RET#ret-expression) and very few mutations reported in subsequent studies, this gene is very unlikely to be relevant in BL. |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 12 | ## History |
| 12 | 13 | ```mermaid |
| ... | ... | @@ -20,7 +21,7 @@ timeline |
| 20 | 21 | |
| 21 | 22 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 22 | 23 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 23 | -| |2 |relevance in BL not firmly established[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 24 | +| |2-F |Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 24 | 25 | |
| 25 | 26 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 26 | 27 |
SALL3.md
| ... | ... | @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ link-citations: true |
| 5 | 5 | --- |
| 6 | 6 | # SALL3 |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene in BL failed QC")>> |
|
| 9 | + |
|
| 8 | 10 | ## History |
| 9 | 11 | ```mermaid |
| 10 | 12 | %%{init: { 'logLevel': 'debug', 'theme': 'dark' } }%% |
| ... | ... | @@ -18,7 +20,7 @@ timeline |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 21 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 20 | 22 | |:------:|:----:|---------------------------------------| |
| 21 | -| |2 |relevance in BL not firmly established [@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 23 | +| |2-F |Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 22 | 24 | | |2 |relevance in MCL not firmly established[@zhangGenomicLandscapeMantle2014]| |
| 23 | 25 | |
| 24 | 26 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
SAPS2.md
| ... | ... | @@ -5,6 +5,9 @@ link-citations: true |
| 5 | 5 | --- |
| 6 | 6 | # SAPS2 |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | + |
|
| 9 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 10 | + |
|
| 8 | 11 | ## History |
| 9 | 12 | ```mermaid |
| 10 | 13 | %%{init: { 'logLevel': 'debug', 'theme': 'dark' } }%% |
| ... | ... | @@ -17,7 +20,7 @@ timeline |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 21 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 19 | 22 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 20 | -| |2 |relevance in BL not firmly established[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 23 | +| |2-F |Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 21 | 24 | |
| 22 | 25 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 23 | 26 |
SF3B1.md
| ... | ... | @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ link-citations: true |
| 5 | 5 | --- |
| 6 | 6 | # SF3B1 |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 9 | + |
|
| 8 | 10 | ## History |
| 9 | 11 | ```mermaid |
| 10 | 12 | %%{init: { 'logLevel': 'debug', 'theme': 'dark' } }%% |
| ... | ... | @@ -17,7 +19,7 @@ timeline |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 20 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 19 | 21 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 20 | -| |2 |relevance in BL not firmly established[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 22 | +| |2-F |Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 21 | 23 | | |1 |high-confidence DLBCL gene | |
| 22 | 24 | |
| 23 | 25 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
SHANK1.md
| ... | ... | @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ link-citations: true |
| 5 | 5 | --- |
| 6 | 6 | # SHANK1 |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 9 | + |
|
| 8 | 10 | ## History |
| 9 | 11 | ```mermaid |
| 10 | 12 | %%{init: { 'logLevel': 'debug', 'theme': 'dark' } }%% |
| ... | ... | @@ -17,7 +19,7 @@ timeline |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 20 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 19 | 21 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 20 | -| |2 |relevance in BL not firmly established[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 22 | +| |2-F|Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 21 | 23 | |
| 22 | 24 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 23 | 25 |
SLC29A2.md
| ... | ... | @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ link-citations: true |
| 5 | 5 | --- |
| 6 | 6 | # SLC29A2 |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 9 | + |
|
| 8 | 10 | ## History |
| 9 | 11 | ```mermaid |
| 10 | 12 | %%{init: { 'logLevel': 'debug', 'theme': 'dark' } }%% |
| ... | ... | @@ -17,7 +19,7 @@ timeline |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 20 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 19 | 21 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 20 | -| |2 |relevance in BL not firmly established[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 22 | +| |2-F| Failed QC [@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 21 | 23 | |
| 22 | 24 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 23 | 25 |
SYNGAP1.md
| ... | ... | @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ link-citations: true |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 8 | Due to [minimal support](SYNGAP1#representative-mutation) in the original primary data and very few mutations reported in subsequent studies, this gene is very unlikely to be relevant in BL. |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 12 | ## History |
| 12 | 13 | ```mermaid |
| ... | ... | @@ -20,7 +21,7 @@ timeline |
| 20 | 21 | |
| 21 | 22 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 22 | 23 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 23 | -| |2 |relevance in BL not firmly established[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 24 | +| |2-F |Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 24 | 25 | |
| 25 | 26 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 26 | 27 |
TBC1D9B.md
| ... | ... | @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ link-citations: true |
| 5 | 5 | --- |
| 6 | 6 | # TBC1D9B |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | +<<Warn("The variants reported in this gene failed QC")>> |
|
| 9 | + |
|
| 8 | 10 | ## History |
| 9 | 11 | ```mermaid |
| 10 | 12 | %%{init: { 'logLevel': 'debug', 'theme': 'dark' } }%% |
| ... | ... | @@ -17,7 +19,7 @@ timeline |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 20 | |Entity|Tier|Description | |
| 19 | 21 | |:------:|:----:|--------------------------------------| |
| 20 | -| |2 |relevance in BL not firmly established[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 22 | +| |2-F |Failed QC[@loveGeneticLandscapeMutations2012]| |
|
| 21 | 23 | |
| 22 | 24 | ## Mutation incidence in large patient cohorts (GAMBL reanalysis) |
| 23 | 25 |