Supplemental_Methods_and_Results.md
... ...
@@ -116,41 +116,13 @@ The FLAGS rank of DLBCL genes in Tier 1, 2 and 3 is compared. The genes in the C
116 116
![COL4A2 - Average rating: ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆](primary/Love_COL4A2.svg)
117 117
118 118
119
+![CYP4F22 - Average rating: ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆](primary/Love_CYP4F22_15523136.png)
119 120
121
+![DLGAP1 - Average rating: ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆](primary/Love_DLGAP_chr18_3869854.png)
120 122
123
+![DTX1 - Average rating: ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆](primary/Love_DTX1_chr12_112017255.png)
121 124
122
-### CYP4F22 - fail (insufficient support)
123
-
124
-
125
-![CYP4F22](primary/Love_CYP4F22_15523136.png)
126
-
127
-Average rating: ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆
128
-
129
-
130
-### DLGAP1 - fail (insufficient support)
131
-
132
-![DLGAP1](primary/Love_DLGAP_chr18_3869854.png)
133
-
134
-Average rating: ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆
135
-
136
-<div style="page-break-after: always;"></div>
137
-
138
-### DTX1 - fail (insufficient support)
139
-
140
-![DTX1](primary/Love_DTX1_chr12_112017255.png)
141
-
142
-Average rating: &starf; &star; &star; &star; &star;
143
-
144
-
145
-### EIF2C4 - fail (insufficient support)
146
-
147
-![EIF2C4](primary/Love_EIF2C4.svg)
148
-
149
-Average rating: &starf; &star; &star; &star; &star;
150
-
151
-<div style="page-break-after: always;"></div>
152
-
153
-### EML2 - fail (insufficient support)
125
+![EIF2C4 - Average rating: &starf; &star; &star; &star; &star;](primary/Love_EIF2C4.svg)
154 126
155 127
![EML2](primary/Love_EML2_50816396.png)
156 128